In tax filings, Broken Promises claimed none of its spending qualified as “direct or indirect political spending.” “That presentation does not seem accurate at all,” said Ellen Aprill, a professor emerita of tax law at Loyola Marymount University who reviewed Broken Promises’ filings for the Herald. “This is political activity.”
Source: Miami Herald
‘Nightmare Scenario’: How FPL Secretly Manipulated a Florida State Senate
